I had the privilege of listening to Adler Online Tuesday night 7-9pm Pacific on CKNW 980 in Vancouver, and I want to thank the Boss of Talk for dedicating a significant proportion of his show to the internet movement led by Kady O'Malley over this issue that most Canadians don't care about. Charles, coming back from holidays decided to ask the question, what is all the fuss about? He brought on people from both sides to present their case, and provided them with a platform to advertise. He did not attempt to silence dissent, but honourably chose to present both sides of the case.
When he went to the phones, the people on the line had all their O'Malley inspired talking points ready to provide a voice to the serial anger of their demographic. I suppose when the majority of people don't care, the only people on the phones are the extremes. Chuck's BS Detector was in full force, and he asked the right questions. Faced with a bombardment of left wing talking points, he provided quality analysis under fire. To Mr. Adler, I ask that you disregard that the large majority of Canadians either don't care or support it, and keep asking the tough questions while this manufactured movement attempts to make a beach head. How many degrees of separation does it take to get people to click on a link?
One charge that these desperately partisan callers kept repeating was that if the Liberal Party had done the same thing, Charles would be outraged, and that he only supports the majority opinion because he is “a conservative”. As a Tory blogger I get that a lot. I remember one time when Ignatieff was giving some speech in Sudbury, I wrote that he was bluffing; the move made no sense, and it was a mistake. I received Liberal rebuttal that because I was a Blogging Tory, the Liberals should do the opposite of what I said. A month later everyone, even on the CBC, agreed that it was a bluff, a mistake, and someone would call it. Some pundits are more concerned with making an accurate statement than trying to trick an opponent into doing the opposite of what is best for the country. I wrote Call Their Bluff while I was watching the Iggy Sudbury speech live, and the rest is history.
The head of the snake at PROROGUE WATCH 2010 is Kady O'Malley. Some of us did not take time off during the Holiday season, and watched the Liberal Pavlovs ring their controversy bell. The entire controversy was contrived by the "Liberal Internet Mafia", and now the CBC is running sequential advertising for their Facebook page. Most people I know use Facebook to share pictures and jokes with friends and family, not for political activism. Those people who manipulate Facebook to achieve a political objective are an entirely different breed. Using it as a vehicle to escalate your anger in others defeats the purpose of its existence.
I consider myself to be a citizen of Adler Nation, and my biggest complaint about the show is that he does not discuss politics more often! Sadly, most people don't care about politics as much as I do, and would rather listen to a show about Talking to Strangers than a discussion about the anger of a segment of rabid left wingers.
Chuck, I'll be listening...
Chuck is obviosly on to something.
ReplyDeleteI get the feeling that in a future segment on this subject he's going to be asking the prorogue watch callers regardless of whether they have any facts to prove something is being taken away, is what do they want to do about it?
Do they want to take away some of the power of the PM or the GG?
Or is it, as I suspect, thye don't like the fact that Harper is the one doing it?
Do Canadians have to listen to more shrieking and fear mongering about H1N1, door knobs carnival sized cheques, body bags, and abusive treatment of Taliban with a shoe for the whole month of February during the Olympics. And Canadians also wait for this - the Liberal party, the Party of Pierre Trudeau, led by their crusader Carolyn Bennet, want to get back into the bedrooms of Canadians, and make the state of sex toys a priority for the Canadian government. Although I am surprised that the Liberals haven't called for an early recall of parliament or an emergency debate on the sex toy crisis, is this what upsets the Liberals and some political pundits, about the prorogation and a delay of getting this subject to the head of the order paper. Is this really what the outrage is all about in the political columns? I think Canadians saw this coming and would rather enjoy the Olympic games then a question period and exhausting debate for days on end, on the state of sex toys in Canada, which would receive the usual expansive coverage by the media.
ReplyDeletePeople like Adler, David Rutherford, lowell Green and others like them, who care deeply for their country and our troops should form a National television of their own across this nation.
ReplyDeleteThe information they will have at hand will shock most canadians who are already under the spell of the so call lousy media we see everyday.
We are suppose to be living in the 21st cent. but somehow, the media wants to keep us in the 70s and 90s; years when liberals were in government.
Afghans moved on, they do not rely on the taliban media for any news at all not after what the people went through. The Afghans and Iraqis have come from years of dictatorship into another world where the people especially women are taking the reins on the media etc something they were not ever allow to do during the taliban period.
If we do not come out of the media's darkness we will the life lived by the afghans and iraqis.
The signs are right there in front of us.
We cannot allow the so call national media dictate to canadians how they(canadian public) must think breathe, vote.