I recently had the opportunity to read excerpts from True Patriot Love in Friday’s National Post and again in MacLean’s magazine. My first impression of this man auditioning to become the leader of my country is that he is a gifted writer. That being said, when I am making my choice of which individual I’d prefer to become my Prime Minister, policy is far more important than the ability to write a narrative. Thus far Ignatieff refuses to release any policy. I want to know what he intends to do if elected when I make my decision; not read superlative rhetoric trying to convince me that he loves this country despite living anywhere but here for almost his entire adult life. I am getting the feeling that he loves 19th century Russia more than 21st century Canada.
That’s what I find creepy about this book, that he has composed this elaborate exposition of why Canadians love our country. I am a young adult and I love this country so much that I choose to live here! It’s as Mr. Ignatieff writes in his book “a country begins to die when people think life is elsewhere and begin to leave.” Oh, really? He thought life was elsewhere, and he left. Does this then suggest that the country is born again when those who chose to emigrate and live abroad for 30 years triumphantly return and immediately begin to campaign for their ascension to political power? Michael got out of Dodge before I was born, and returned when I was 26. I have my own reasons for loving my country, and I will not accept a naturalized foreigner obsessed with Czarist Russia to tell me why I am a Patriot.
Furthermore, he only decided to return to Canada after the Gomery Commission was going full steam ahead and ravaging the Martin Regime in the polls. It took Liberal insiders to actually visit him in New England feeding him delusions of grandeur to pry him away from the United States. Does anyone doubt that had Paul Martin won a majority in 2004 that Michael Ignatieff would still be living in Boston telling people he’s an American?
Now that he has ascended to the throne of Liberal leadership, the biggest obstacle standing between Iggy and true patriot power is justifying his 30 year absence. It is imperative that he make Canadians feel comfortable with his perpetual decision to live anywhere but here before he will ever be elected Czar of Canada. He must convince Canadians that he loves his country, despite not wanting to live here. Enter True Patriot Love, a manifesto of convoluted hyperbole designed to enlighten Canadians about how they feel about patriotism. It goes far beyond the author attempting to convince the reader that he loves his country; it has the audacity to inform Canadians of how we feel. Did he happen upon these revelations while he was living in Great Britain or while he was living in the United States?
It is abundantly clear in reading his writing, that Michael Ignatieff has a substantial preoccupation with his family ties to Russian Czarist aristocracy who were forced to flee Russia during the Russian revolution. My own ancestors immigrated to Canada from Scotland over 200 years ago, because the new world was the land of opportunity and they wanted to live here. They were not forced to flee here as refugees because their own incompetence of governance led to the collapse of a hereditary monarchy. My patriotism has been passed down from generation to generation of middle class Canadians with a love of country that was born from our desire to live here. My ancestors did not resent that they had to leave their homeland; they were not angry that they had been overthrown from a position of entitlement and power.
Here is an excerpt from MacLean’s review of True Patriot Love,
http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/17/book-review-michael-ignatieffs-true-patriot-love
“Michael Ignatieff was drawn more to the Russia his grandparents, father, and uncles had fled than to the Canada they embraced, the country prepared for their arrival, in effect, by people like the Grants. “Between my two pasts, the Canadian and the Russian, I felt I had to choose,” Ignatieff wrote. “I chose the vanished past, the past lost behind the revolution. I could count on my mother’s inheritance: it was always there. It was my father’s past that mattered to me, because it was the one I had to recover, to make my own.””
He was not lured back to Canada for love of country, he returned because he wants to be the Czar of Canada. He resents that his ancestors were forced to become Canadian, and as evidenced by the sub-title “Four Generations in Search of Canada”, he confesses that his ancestors spent an inordinate amount of time trying to decide if they even liked it here. Four generations to make up their minds, that despite living in Canada they still felt the need to search for it. This culminated in Michael himself deciding that he wanted to live abroad once he had entered adulthood. This was not just a one year venture teaching English in Korea, he left for 30 years. He admits to telling people he was American while living in America. That sure sounds like true patriot love to me...*cough*cough* When I visit the United States, I wear my Team Canada hat, my Team Canada shirt, because I want everyone who sees me to know where I’m from because I am proud of my Canadian heritage, whereas Michael Ignatieff is in love with his Russian lineage
“When I am abroad, I always make it a rule never to criticize or attack the government of my own country. I make up for lost time when I come home.”
-Sir Winston Churchill
It is so obvious why Iggy wrote the book and had it published now. Promotion. Win the people over. Get interviews such as Alan Gregg of TVO who almost swooned.
ReplyDeleteFrankly, it worked for Obama and it might for the Patriot.
Edmund Onward James
www.onwardjames.com
This is very well written. There has been a fair amount written about this, the past few days and your evaluation, reads like a 'first time' for me. Excellent!
ReplyDeleteGood analysis. Iggy is the type of "Canadian" who disgusts me. He's a Canadian of convenience.
ReplyDeleteA Canadian is someone who want to be here, regardless of whether they were born here, and work to contribute to making Canada a great country. Iggy is not such a person.
" Does anyone doubt that had Paul Martin won a majority in 2004 that Michael Ignatieff would still be living in Boston telling people he’s an American? " no shit . gotta save that line . thats it in a nutshell
ReplyDeleteI do agree with Ignatieff's "lesser evil" philosophies of pre-emptive wars, coerced interrogation, indefinite detention of enemy combatants, and especially targeted assassinations. Hugo Chavez is a Bolshevik, and there is a high probability that Ignatieff's condemnation of Marxists and support of political assassination would suggest that he would support sending a few snipers on "special assignment" in Venezuela...Sadly though, since Iggy refuses to make any policy announcements other than raising taxes, I doubt that he would ever come out and say lets shoot Chavez in the head…
ReplyDelete"He resents that his ancestors were forced to become Canadian, and as evidenced by the sub-title “Four Generations in Search of Canada”, he confesses that his ancestors spent an inordinate amount of time trying to decide if they even liked it here."
ReplyDeleteThe "four generations" in the title are the Grants, not the Ignatieffs; being 'in search' of Canada is a romantic notion of looking for the idea. Obviously, since they lived there to great success, they liked it.
"My ancestors did not resent that they had to leave their homeland; they were not angry that they had been overthrown from a position of entitlement and power."
You have obviously not read The Russia Album. Ignatieff is fascinated by his family's history (justifiably; its quite interesting), and proud of many of their accomplishments, but it is not a paean to the Romanovs. Much of it is about the fundamental flaws in the system his family was blind to.
regardless of which side of the family the "4 generations" comes from, Ignatieff professed to choosing the Russian roots.
ReplyDelete“Between my two pasts, the Canadian and the Russian, I felt I had to choose,” Ignatieff wrote. “I chose the vanished past, the past lost behind the revolution. I could count on my mother’s inheritance: it was always there. It was my father’s past that mattered to me, because it was the one I had to recover, to make my own.”
And no, I have not nor will not read any of his books because that would require me spending money on his books. Just as I am sure that 95% of Canadians won't read any of his books. Sadly, I am restricted to reading the excerpts that Ignatieff is releasing to the media, which I'm sure he considers to be the parts that he most wants Canadians to read.
ReplyDelete